Aruba vs Belarus: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Agriculture orientation
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Agriculture orientation over time
- Aruba
- Belarus
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.6399 against 0.6294 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0105.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 50th and Belarus ranks 51st of 118 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.33 | 1.81 | 51.52 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 21.06 | 2.45 | 18.61 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 3.59 | 1.68 | 1.91 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.08 | 0.6064 | 0.4757 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — agriculture orientation, Aruba or Belarus?
- Aruba, at 0.6399 against 0.6294 in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — agriculture orientation between Aruba and Belarus?
- 0.0105, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belarus?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Belarus rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — agriculture orientation?
- Aruba ranks 50th and Belarus ranks 51st of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Agriculture orientation index US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.