Afghanistan vs Guinea-Bissau: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Afghanistan
0.0028
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
0.0069
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
118th
Guinea-Bissau rank
115th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.0020.0040.0060.008200220132024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0069 against 0.0028 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0041.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 2.4 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 118th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 115th of 119 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0003 0.0014 0.0011 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0037 0.0018 0.0019 Afghanistan
2020s 0.0028 0.0036 0.0007 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Afghanistan or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0069 against 0.0028 in Afghanistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Afghanistan and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0041, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guinea-Bissau?
9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do Afghanistan and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Afghanistan ranks 118th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 115th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guinea-Bissau: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/afghanistan/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/afghanistan/guinea-bissau/">Afghanistan vs Guinea-Bissau: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.