Australia and New Zealand vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Australia and New Zealand
1.92
in 2024
Republic of Korea
2.14
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Republic of Korea rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Republic of Korea
0123200820162024

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 2.14 against 1.92 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.22.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 7th of 119 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2010s 2.23 1.25 0.9783 Australia and New Zealand
2020s 2.09 1.81 0.2735 Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Australia and New Zealand or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 2.14 against 1.92 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Australia and New Zealand and Republic of Korea?
0.22, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Republic of Korea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Republic of Korea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 7th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/australia-and-new-zealand/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/australia-and-new-zealand/republic-of-korea/">Australia and New Zealand vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.