Australia vs Estonia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Australia
1.57
in 2024
Estonia
1.16
in 2024
Australia rank
11th
Estonia rank
13th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Australia
  • Estonia
00.511.52199320082024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.57 against 1.16 in Estonia, a difference of 0.41.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 13th of 119 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9777 0.2365 0.7412 Australia
2000s 1.36 0.3913 0.9696 Australia
2010s 1.54 0.7142 0.827 Australia
2020s 1.6 1.33 0.2795 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Australia or Estonia?
Australia, at 1.57 against 1.16 in Estonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Australia and Estonia?
0.41, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Australia ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 13th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Estonia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/australia/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/australia/estonia/">Australia vs Estonia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.