Belarus vs China, mainland: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Belarus
0.2148
in 2024
China, mainland
0.2321
in 2024
Belarus rank
49th
China, mainland rank
46th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Belarus
  • China, mainland
00.511.5199920112024

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 0.2321 against 0.2148 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0173.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 49th and China, mainland ranks 46th of 119 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and China, mainland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus China, mainland Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5691 0.1696 0.3994 Belarus
2020s 0.1959 0.201 0.0051 China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Belarus or China, mainland?
China, mainland, at 0.2321 against 0.2148 in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Belarus and China, mainland?
0.0173, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China, mainland?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Belarus and China, mainland rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Belarus ranks 49th and China, mainland ranks 46th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs China, mainland: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/belarus/china-mainland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/belarus/china-mainland/">Belarus vs China, mainland: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.