Belgium vs New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Belgium
2.43
in 2021
New Zealand
3.67
in 2024
Belgium rank
4th
New Zealand rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Belgium
  • New Zealand
123456199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 3.67 against 2.43 in Belgium, a difference of 1.24.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 119 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 3.73 3.34 0.3903 Belgium
2010s 3.06 5.01 1.95 New Zealand
2020s 2.76 4.71 1.95 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Belgium or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 3.67 against 2.43 in Belgium as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Belgium and New Zealand?
1.24, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Zealand?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Belgium and New Zealand rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Belgium ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/belgium/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/belgium/new-zealand/">Belgium vs New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.