Jordan vs Kyrgyzstan: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Jordan
0.3357
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
0.3181
in 2024
Jordan rank
32nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
35th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Jordan
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.20.40.6199320082024

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.3357 against 0.3181 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0176.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 35th of 119 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3804 0.002 0.3784 Jordan
2000s 0.3324 0.0349 0.2975 Jordan
2010s 0.2314 0.2369 0.0055 Kyrgyzstan
2020s 0.3133 0.3473 0.034 Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Jordan or Kyrgyzstan?
Jordan, at 0.3357 against 0.3181 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Jordan and Kyrgyzstan?
0.0176, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Kyrgyzstan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Jordan ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 35th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Kyrgyzstan: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/jordan/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/jordan/kyrgyz-republic/">Jordan vs Kyrgyzstan: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.