Lesotho vs Mali: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time
- Lesotho
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.0309 against 0.0297 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0012.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mali ahead.
Lesotho ranks 96th and Mali ranks 95th of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0152 | 0.0204 | 0.0052 | Mali |
| 2020s | 0.0368 | 0.028 | 0.0088 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Lesotho or Mali?
- Mali, at 0.0309 against 0.0297 in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Lesotho and Mali?
- 0.0012, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mali?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Mali rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
- Lesotho ranks 96th and Mali ranks 95th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.