Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Middle Africa
0.0234
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
0.07
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.020.040.060.08199320082024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.07 against 0.0234 in Middle Africa, a difference of 0.0466.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.0 times Middle Africa's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 14 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0572 0.0489 0.0083 Middle Africa
2020s 0.0378 0.0534 0.0156 United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.07 against 0.0234 in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.0466, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Middle Africa ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.