Northern America vs Syrian Arab Republic: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Northern America
0.4089
in 2024
Syrian Arab Republic
0.0315
in 2021
Northern America rank
7th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
9th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Northern America
  • Syrian Arab Republic
00.10.20.30.40.5199120072024

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 0.4089 against 0.0315 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.3774.

That makes Northern America's figure about 13.0 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Northern America ranks 7th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 9th of 29 groups.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4456 0.0011 0.4445 Northern America
2020s 0.4 0.0214 0.3786 Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Northern America or Syrian Arab Republic?
Northern America, at 0.4089 against 0.0315 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Northern America and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.3774, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Syrian Arab Republic?
12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Northern America and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Northern America ranks 7th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 9th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Syrian Arab Republic: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/northern-america/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/northern-america/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Northern America vs Syrian Arab Republic: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.