Northern Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added

Northern Europe
0.9064
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
0.07
in 2023
Northern Europe rank
5th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time

  • Northern Europe
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.511.5199320082024

How they compare

Northern Europe currently reports 0.9064 against 0.07 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.8364.

That makes Northern Europe's figure about 12.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.

Northern Europe ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 29 groups.

Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Europe United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 1.28 0.0489 1.23 Northern Europe
2020s 1.11 0.0534 1.05 Northern Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Northern Europe or United Republic of Tanzania?
Northern Europe, at 0.9064 against 0.07 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Northern Europe and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.8364, with Northern Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Northern Europe and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
Northern Europe ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/northern-europe/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-ratio-of-value-added-agriculture-forestry-and/northern-europe/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Northern Europe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.