Panama vs Southern Africa: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added over time
- Panama
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.842 against 0.1214 in Southern Africa, a difference of 0.7206.
That makes Panama's figure about 6.9 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 17th and Southern Africa ranks 18th of 119 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9456 | 0.0866 | 0.859 | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.8857 | 0.113 | 0.7727 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added, Panama or Southern Africa?
- Panama, at 0.842 against 0.1214 in Southern Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added between Panama and Southern Africa?
- 0.7206, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Southern Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Southern Africa rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — ratio of value added?
- Panama ranks 17th and Southern Africa ranks 18th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Ratio of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.