Aruba vs Qatar: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit over time
- Aruba
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.048 % against 0.0144 % in Aruba, a difference of 0.0336 %.
That makes Qatar's figure about 3.3 times Aruba's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 118th and Qatar ranks 115th of 119 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4044 % | 0.1 % | 0.3044 % | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.3568 % | 0.0355 % | 0.3214 % | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit, Aruba or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.048 % against 0.0144 % in Aruba as of 2002.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit between Aruba and Qatar?
- 0.0336 %, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Qatar?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2002.
- How do Aruba and Qatar rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit?
- Aruba ranks 118th and Qatar ranks 115th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.