Bhutan vs Jordan: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit over time
- Bhutan
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2.01 % against 1.99 % in Bhutan, a difference of 0.02 %.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 78th and Jordan ranks 76th of 119 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.03 % | 1.88 % | 1.15 % | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 3.72 % | 1.49 % | 2.23 % | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 3.45 % | 1.8 % | 1.66 % | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit, Bhutan or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 2.01 % against 1.99 % in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit between Bhutan and Jordan?
- 0.02 %, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Jordan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Jordan rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit?
- Bhutan ranks 78th and Jordan ranks 76th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.