Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
5.32 %
in 2024
Zimbabwe
15.87 %
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
4th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
0102030199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 15.87 % against 5.32 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 10.55 %.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.0 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 29 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 5.65 % 21.2 % 15.56 % Zimbabwe
2020s 5.3 % 21.9 % 16.59 % Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 15.87 % against 5.32 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
10.55 %, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-share-of-total-credit-us-2015-prices/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-share-of-total-credit-us-2015-prices/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.