Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uruguay: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
5.29 %
in 2024
Uruguay
14.55 %
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
Uruguay rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uruguay
57.51012.51517.5199120072024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 14.55 % against 5.29 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 9.26 %.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 2.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 7th of 29 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 8.11 % 6.42 % 1.69 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 9.28 % 10.46 % 1.18 % Uruguay
2010s 6.59 % 14.44 % 7.85 % Uruguay
2020s 5.43 % 13.95 % 8.53 % Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 14.55 % against 5.29 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uruguay?
9.26 %, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uruguay rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 7th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uruguay: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-share-of-total-credit-us-2015-prices/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-share-of-total-credit-us-2015-prices/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uruguay/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uruguay: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.