Namibia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit

Namibia
16.86 %
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
10.63 %
in 2023
Namibia rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit over time

  • Namibia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
10203040199320082024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 16.86 % against 10.63 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 6.23 %.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Namibia ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 119 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 14.95 % 12 % 2.95 % Namibia
2010s 20.63 % 9.62 % 11.02 % Namibia
2020s 25.51 % 8.96 % 16.55 % Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit, Namibia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Namibia, at 16.86 % against 10.63 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit between Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania?
6.23 %, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — share of total credit?
Namibia ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-share-of-total-credit-us-2015-prices/namibia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-share-of-total-credit-us-2015-prices/namibia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Namibia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Share of Total Credit US$, 2015 prices
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.