Australia vs Malawi: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Australia
92,280 million SLC
in 2024
Malawi
86,100 million SLC
in 2024
Australia rank
24th
Malawi rank
27th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Australia
  • Malawi
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199320082024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 92,280 million SLC against 86,100 million SLC in Malawi, a difference of 6,180 million SLC.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 27th of 118 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 53,653 million SLC 18,367 million SLC 35,286 million SLC Australia
2010s 62,597 million SLC 75,236 million SLC 12,639 million SLC Malawi
2020s 81,817 million SLC 76,736 million SLC 5,081 million SLC Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Australia or Malawi?
Australia, at 92,280 million SLC against 86,100 million SLC in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Australia and Malawi?
6,180 million SLC, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malawi?
22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Australia and Malawi rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Australia ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 27th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Malawi: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/australia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/australia/malawi/">Australia vs Malawi: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.