Australia vs Senegal: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Australia
92,280 million SLC
in 2024
Senegal
105,727 million SLC
in 2024
Australia rank
24th
Senegal rank
23rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Australia
  • Senegal
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199220082024

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 105,727 million SLC against 92,280 million SLC in Australia, a difference of 13,447 million SLC.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Senegal ahead.

Australia ranks 24th and Senegal ranks 23rd of 118 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Senegal Difference Ahead
1990s 26,836 million SLC 37,318 million SLC 10,482 million SLC Senegal
2000s 48,573 million SLC 34,132 million SLC 14,442 million SLC Australia
2010s 62,942 million SLC 51,913 million SLC 11,029 million SLC Australia
2020s 81,817 million SLC 106,878 million SLC 25,062 million SLC Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Australia or Senegal?
Senegal, at 105,727 million SLC against 92,280 million SLC in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Australia and Senegal?
13,447 million SLC, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Senegal?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Australia and Senegal rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Australia ranks 24th and Senegal ranks 23rd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Senegal: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/australia/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/australia/senegal/">Australia vs Senegal: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.