Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Bosnia and Herzegovina
172.48 million SLC
in 2024
Namibia
228.47 million SLC
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
101st
Namibia rank
99th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Namibia
100200300400500200520142024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 228.47 million SLC against 172.48 million SLC in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 55.99 million SLC.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Namibia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 99th of 118 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 174.96 million SLC 379.05 million SLC 204.1 million SLC Namibia
2010s 187.87 million SLC 271.83 million SLC 83.96 million SLC Namibia
2020s 180.6 million SLC 304.88 million SLC 124.29 million SLC Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
Namibia, at 228.47 million SLC against 172.48 million SLC in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
55.99 million SLC, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 99th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.