Botswana vs United Arab Emirates: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Botswana
1,330 million SLC
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
1,375 million SLC
in 2024
Botswana rank
80th
United Arab Emirates rank
78th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Botswana
  • United Arab Emirates
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520092024

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 1,375 million SLC against 1,330 million SLC in Botswana, a difference of 45 million SLC.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 118 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 197.25 million SLC 1,839 million SLC 1,642 million SLC United Arab Emirates
2010s 829.22 million SLC 1,630 million SLC 800.59 million SLC United Arab Emirates
2020s 1,175 million SLC 2,102 million SLC 926.76 million SLC United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Botswana or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 1,375 million SLC against 1,330 million SLC in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Botswana and United Arab Emirates?
45 million SLC, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and United Arab Emirates?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Botswana and United Arab Emirates rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Botswana ranks 80th and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs United Arab Emirates: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/botswana/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/botswana/united-arab-emirates/">Botswana vs United Arab Emirates: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.