Egypt vs Rwanda: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time
- Egypt
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 16,326 million SLC against 15,740 million SLC in Egypt, a difference of 586 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 54th and Rwanda ranks 52nd of 118 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16,348 million SLC | 1,493 million SLC | 14,855 million SLC | Egypt |
| 2000s | 17,887 million SLC | 9,085 million SLC | 8,802 million SLC | Egypt |
| 2010s | 10,099 million SLC | 23,762 million SLC | 13,662 million SLC | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 19,923 million SLC | 16,781 million SLC | 3,143 million SLC | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Egypt or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 16,326 million SLC against 15,740 million SLC in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Egypt and Rwanda?
- 586 million SLC, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Rwanda rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
- Egypt ranks 54th and Rwanda ranks 52nd of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.