Indonesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Indonesia
403.72 million million SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
2.58 million million SLC
in 2023
Indonesia rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Indonesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199320082024

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 403.72 million million SLC against 2.58 million million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 401.14 million million SLC.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 156.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 118 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 93.17 million million SLC 70,386 million SLC 93.10 million million SLC Indonesia
2000s 83.10 million million SLC 490,579 million SLC 82.61 million million SLC Indonesia
2010s 240.18 million million SLC 1.23 million million SLC 238.95 million million SLC Indonesia
2020s 375.14 million million SLC 1.88 million million SLC 373.26 million million SLC Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Indonesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Indonesia, at 403.72 million million SLC against 2.58 million million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Indonesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
401.14 million million SLC, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Indonesia ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/indonesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/indonesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Indonesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.