Japan vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Japan
977,756 million SLC
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
2,781 million SLC
in 2024
Japan rank
10th
Republic of Moldova rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Japan
  • Republic of Moldova
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M199820112024

How they compare

Japan currently reports 977,756 million SLC against 2,781 million SLC in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 974,975 million SLC.

That makes Japan's figure about 351.6 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 10th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 118 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 495,228 million SLC 2,188 million SLC 493,040 million SLC Japan
2000s 378,231 million SLC 4,408 million SLC 373,824 million SLC Japan
2010s 882,072 million SLC 3,150 million SLC 878,923 million SLC Japan
2020s 1.02 million million SLC 2,876 million SLC 1.02 million million SLC Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Japan or Republic of Moldova?
Japan, at 977,756 million SLC against 2,781 million SLC in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Japan and Republic of Moldova?
974,975 million SLC, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Japan and Republic of Moldova rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Japan ranks 10th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/japan/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/japan/republic-of-moldova/">Japan vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.