New Zealand vs Uruguay: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

New Zealand
47,287 million SLC
in 2024
Uruguay
53,815 million SLC
in 2024
New Zealand rank
36th
Uruguay rank
33rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • New Zealand
  • Uruguay
020.0k40.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 53,815 million SLC against 47,287 million SLC in New Zealand, a difference of 6,528 million SLC.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 36th and Uruguay ranks 33rd of 118 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 17,524 million SLC 13,322 million SLC 4,202 million SLC New Zealand
2000s 33,117 million SLC 14,058 million SLC 19,059 million SLC New Zealand
2010s 54,502 million SLC 31,213 million SLC 23,290 million SLC New Zealand
2020s 51,145 million SLC 43,546 million SLC 7,599 million SLC New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, New Zealand or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 53,815 million SLC against 47,287 million SLC in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between New Zealand and Uruguay?
6,528 million SLC, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
New Zealand ranks 36th and Uruguay ranks 33rd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Uruguay: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/new-zealand/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/new-zealand/uruguay/">New Zealand vs Uruguay: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.