Pakistan vs Philippines: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Pakistan
178,470 million SLC
in 2024
Philippines
234,352 million SLC
in 2024
Pakistan rank
21st
Philippines rank
19th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199420092024

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 234,352 million SLC against 178,470 million SLC in Pakistan, a difference of 55,882 million SLC.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 21st and Philippines ranks 19th of 118 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 318,330 million SLC 123,541 million SLC 194,789 million SLC Pakistan
2000s 323,244 million SLC 234,708 million SLC 88,536 million SLC Pakistan
2010s 276,800 million SLC 238,878 million SLC 37,923 million SLC Pakistan
2020s 205,444 million SLC 225,599 million SLC 20,156 million SLC Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Pakistan or Philippines?
Philippines, at 234,352 million SLC against 178,470 million SLC in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Pakistan and Philippines?
55,882 million SLC, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Philippines rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Pakistan ranks 21st and Philippines ranks 19th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Philippines: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/pakistan/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/pakistan/philippines/">Pakistan vs Philippines: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.