Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Papua New Guinea
166.53 million SLC
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
137.98 million SLC
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
102nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
103rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 166.53 million SLC against 137.98 million SLC in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 28.55 million SLC.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 102nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 103rd of 118 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 171.2 million SLC 119.94 million SLC 51.25 million SLC Papua New Guinea
2010s 205.41 million SLC 108.96 million SLC 96.45 million SLC Papua New Guinea
2020s 207.74 million SLC 138.91 million SLC 68.83 million SLC Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
Papua New Guinea, at 166.53 million SLC against 137.98 million SLC in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
28.55 million SLC, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Papua New Guinea ranks 102nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 103rd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/papua-new-guinea/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/papua-new-guinea/trinidad-and-tobago/">Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.