Philippines vs Sri Lanka: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Philippines
234,352 million SLC
in 2024
Sri Lanka
292,546 million SLC
in 2024
Philippines rank
19th
Sri Lanka rank
17th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Philippines
  • Sri Lanka
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199620102024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 292,546 million SLC against 234,352 million SLC in Philippines, a difference of 58,194 million SLC.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 118 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 123,541 million SLC 59,835 million SLC 63,706 million SLC Philippines
2000s 234,708 million SLC 81,409 million SLC 153,299 million SLC Philippines
2010s 238,878 million SLC 339,726 million SLC 100,848 million SLC Sri Lanka
2020s 225,599 million SLC 341,065 million SLC 115,466 million SLC Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Philippines or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 292,546 million SLC against 234,352 million SLC in Philippines as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Philippines and Sri Lanka?
58,194 million SLC, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Philippines and Sri Lanka rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Philippines ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Sri Lanka: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/philippines/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/philippines/sri-lanka/">Philippines vs Sri Lanka: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.