Uganda vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Uganda
1.92 million million SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
2.58 million million SLC
in 2023
Uganda rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Uganda
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0M2.0M3.0M199320082024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 2.58 million million SLC against 1.92 million million SLC in Uganda, a difference of 657,260 million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Uganda ahead.

Uganda ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 118 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 221,568 million SLC 76,081 million SLC 145,487 million SLC Uganda
2000s 273,999 million SLC 490,579 million SLC 216,580 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 1.09 million million SLC 1.23 million million SLC 137,077 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 1.83 million million SLC 1.88 million million SLC 41,005 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Uganda or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 2.58 million million SLC against 1.92 million million SLC in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Uganda and United Republic of Tanzania?
657,260 million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and United Republic of Tanzania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Uganda and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Uganda ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/uganda/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/uganda/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Uganda vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.