United States of America vs Viet Nam: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

United States of America
64,522 million SLC
in 2024
Viet Nam
788.20 million million SLC
in 2024
United States of America rank
2nd
Viet Nam rank
1st

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • United States of America
  • Viet Nam
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199120072024

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 788.20 million million SLC against 64,522 million SLC in United States of America, a difference of 788.13 million million SLC.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.

United States of America ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 3 groups.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United States of America Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2010s 73,632 million SLC 490.58 million million SLC 490.51 million million SLC Viet Nam
2020s 62,848 million SLC 731.32 million million SLC 731.26 million million SLC Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, United States of America or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 788.20 million million SLC against 64,522 million SLC in United States of America as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between United States of America and Viet Nam?
788.13 million million SLC, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United States of America and Viet Nam?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do United States of America and Viet Nam rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
United States of America ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United States of America vs Viet Nam: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/united-states-of-america/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/united-states-of-america/viet-nam-2/">United States of America vs Viet Nam: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.