Argentina vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Argentina
2.43 million million SLC
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
5,079 million SLC
in 2024
Argentina rank
8th
Republic of Moldova rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Argentina
  • Republic of Moldova
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M199220082024

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 2.43 million million SLC against 5,079 million SLC in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 2.42 million million SLC.

That makes Argentina's figure about 478.2 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 118 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 4,766 million SLC 445.2 million SLC 4,321 million SLC Argentina
2000s 8,172 million SLC 2,000 million SLC 6,173 million SLC Argentina
2010s 108,710 million SLC 2,858 million SLC 105,852 million SLC Argentina
2020s 1.03 million million SLC 4,427 million SLC 1.02 million million SLC Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Argentina or Republic of Moldova?
Argentina, at 2.43 million million SLC against 5,079 million SLC in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Argentina and Republic of Moldova?
2.42 million million SLC, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Republic of Moldova?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Republic of Moldova rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Argentina ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 7th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/argentina/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/argentina/republic-of-moldova/">Argentina vs Republic of Moldova: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.