Australia vs Ethiopia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Australia
128,354 million SLC
in 2024
Ethiopia
105,128 million SLC
in 2024
Australia rank
29th
Ethiopia rank
31st

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Australia
  • Ethiopia
050.0k100.0k150.0k199320082024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 128,354 million SLC against 105,128 million SLC in Ethiopia, a difference of 23,226 million SLC.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 29th and Ethiopia ranks 31st of 118 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Ethiopia Difference Ahead
2000s 47,365 million SLC 3,718 million SLC 43,647 million SLC Australia
2010s 64,604 million SLC 16,600 million SLC 48,004 million SLC Australia
2020s 105,716 million SLC 60,689 million SLC 45,027 million SLC Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Australia or Ethiopia?
Australia, at 128,354 million SLC against 105,128 million SLC in Ethiopia as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Australia and Ethiopia?
23,226 million SLC, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ethiopia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Australia and Ethiopia rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Australia ranks 29th and Ethiopia ranks 31st of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Ethiopia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/australia/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/australia/ethiopia/">Australia vs Ethiopia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.