Cambodia vs United States of America: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Cambodia
19.49 million million SLC
in 2024
United States of America
83,024 million SLC
in 2024
Cambodia rank
4th
United States of America rank
2nd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Cambodia
  • United States of America
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199120072024

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 19.49 million million SLC against 83,024 million SLC in United States of America, a difference of 19.40 million million SLC.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 234.7 times United States of America's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 2nd of 118 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 302,199 million SLC 54,669 million SLC 247,530 million SLC Cambodia
2010s 4.51 million million SLC 71,515 million SLC 4.44 million million SLC Cambodia
2020s 15.41 million million SLC 75,060 million SLC 15.34 million million SLC Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Cambodia or United States of America?
Cambodia, at 19.49 million million SLC against 83,024 million SLC in United States of America as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Cambodia and United States of America?
19.40 million million SLC, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and United States of America?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and United States of America rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Cambodia ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 2nd of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs United States of America: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/cambodia/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/cambodia/united-states-of-america/">Cambodia vs United States of America: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.