China, mainland vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

China, mainland
2.38 million million SLC
in 2024
Russian Federation
2.83 million million SLC
in 2024
China, mainland rank
9th
Russian Federation rank
6th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • China, mainland
  • Russian Federation
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M3.0M201020172024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 2.83 million million SLC against 2.38 million million SLC in China, mainland, a difference of 451,270 million SLC.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times China, mainland's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 118 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2010s 1.02 million million SLC 1.50 million million SLC 489,608 million SLC Russian Federation
2020s 1.88 million million SLC 2.64 million million SLC 766,622 million SLC Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, China, mainland or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 2.83 million million SLC against 2.38 million million SLC in China, mainland as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between China, mainland and Russian Federation?
451,270 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Russian Federation?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China, mainland and Russian Federation rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
China, mainland ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/china-mainland/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/china-mainland/russian-federation-2/">China, mainland vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.