Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Ecuador
244.66 million SLC
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
271.3 million SLC
in 2024
Ecuador rank
101st
Papua New Guinea rank
99th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Ecuador
  • Papua New Guinea
0100200300400500200420142024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 271.3 million SLC against 244.66 million SLC in Ecuador, a difference of 26.64 million SLC.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Ecuador ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 99th of 118 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 22.13 million SLC 178.45 million SLC 156.32 million SLC Papua New Guinea
2010s 119.08 million SLC 205.77 million SLC 86.69 million SLC Papua New Guinea
2020s 239.98 million SLC 246.17 million SLC 6.19 million SLC Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Ecuador or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 271.3 million SLC against 244.66 million SLC in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Ecuador and Papua New Guinea?
26.64 million SLC, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Papua New Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Ecuador ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 99th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/ecuador/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/ecuador/papua-new-guinea/">Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.