Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Ecuador
244.66 million SLC
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
168.3 million SLC
in 2024
Ecuador rank
101st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
104th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Ecuador
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0100200300400199120072024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 244.66 million SLC against 168.3 million SLC in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 76.36 million SLC.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.5 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Ecuador ranks 101st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 118 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 22.13 million SLC 133.15 million SLC 111.02 million SLC Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 119.08 million SLC 120.24 million SLC 1.16 million SLC Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 239.98 million SLC 161.9 million SLC 78.08 million SLC Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Ecuador or Trinidad and Tobago?
Ecuador, at 244.66 million SLC against 168.3 million SLC in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2022.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
76.36 million SLC, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Ecuador ranks 101st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/">Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.