Egypt vs New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Egypt
60,597 million SLC
in 2024
New Zealand
62,705 million SLC
in 2024
Egypt rank
41st
New Zealand rank
40th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Egypt
  • New Zealand
020.0k40.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 62,705 million SLC against 60,597 million SLC in Egypt, a difference of 2,108 million SLC.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 41st and New Zealand ranks 40th of 118 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 3,749 million SLC 8,736 million SLC 4,987 million SLC New Zealand
2000s 6,091 million SLC 27,056 million SLC 20,964 million SLC New Zealand
2010s 10,994 million SLC 54,758 million SLC 43,765 million SLC New Zealand
2020s 51,506 million SLC 62,312 million SLC 10,806 million SLC New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Egypt or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 62,705 million SLC against 60,597 million SLC in Egypt as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Egypt and New Zealand?
2,108 million SLC, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Egypt and New Zealand rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Egypt ranks 41st and New Zealand ranks 40th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/egypt-arab-rep/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/egypt-arab-rep/new-zealand/">Egypt vs New Zealand: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.