El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

El Salvador
383.42 million SLC
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
271.3 million SLC
in 2024
El Salvador rank
96th
Papua New Guinea rank
99th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • El Salvador
  • Papua New Guinea
100200300400500200220132024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 383.42 million SLC against 271.3 million SLC in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 112.12 million SLC.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.4 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 96th and Papua New Guinea ranks 99th of 118 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 315.72 million SLC 126.04 million SLC 189.68 million SLC El Salvador
2010s 379.26 million SLC 208.19 million SLC 171.07 million SLC El Salvador
2020s 400.48 million SLC 305.24 million SLC 95.24 million SLC El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, El Salvador or Papua New Guinea?
El Salvador, at 383.42 million SLC against 271.3 million SLC in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
112.12 million SLC, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
El Salvador ranks 96th and Papua New Guinea ranks 99th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/el-salvador/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/el-salvador/papua-new-guinea/">El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.