Lebanon vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Lebanon
14.30 million million SLC
in 2024
Russian Federation
2.83 million million SLC
in 2024
Lebanon rank
5th
Russian Federation rank
6th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Lebanon
  • Russian Federation
05.0M10.0M15.0M201020172024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 14.30 million million SLC against 2.83 million million SLC in Russian Federation, a difference of 11.47 million million SLC.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 5.0 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Lebanon ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 118 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2010s 925,427 million SLC 1.50 million million SLC 579,368 million SLC Russian Federation
2020s 3.82 million million SLC 2.64 million million SLC 1.17 million million SLC Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Lebanon or Russian Federation?
Lebanon, at 14.30 million million SLC against 2.83 million million SLC in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Lebanon and Russian Federation?
11.47 million million SLC, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Russian Federation?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Lebanon and Russian Federation rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Lebanon ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/lebanon/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/lebanon/russian-federation-2/">Lebanon vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.