Republic of Moldova vs Uganda: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local

Republic of Moldova
5,079 million SLC
in 2024
Uganda
2.73 million million SLC
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
7th
Uganda rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Uganda
01.0M2.0M3.0M199820112024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 2.73 million million SLC against 5,079 million SLC in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 2.72 million million SLC.

That makes Uganda's figure about 536.7 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 7th of 9 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 445.2 million SLC 70,178 million SLC 69,733 million SLC Uganda
2000s 2,000 million SLC 125,137 million SLC 123,137 million SLC Uganda
2010s 2,858 million SLC 1.12 million million SLC 1.12 million million SLC Uganda
2020s 4,427 million SLC 2.42 million million SLC 2.41 million million SLC Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local, Republic of Moldova or Uganda?
Uganda, at 2.73 million million SLC against 5,079 million SLC in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local between Republic of Moldova and Uganda?
2.72 million million SLC, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Uganda?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and Uganda rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value standard local?
Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Uganda ranks 7th of 9 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Uganda: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/republic-of-moldova/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/republic-of-moldova/uganda/">Republic of Moldova vs Uganda: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 3,175 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.