Albania vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Albania
39.23 million USD
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
60.15 million USD
in 2024
Albania rank
93rd
Papua New Guinea rank
91st

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Albania
  • Papua New Guinea
20406080100120200420142024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 60.15 million USD against 39.23 million USD in Albania, a difference of 20.92 million USD.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Albania ranks 93rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 119 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 28.02 million USD 73.56 million USD 45.53 million USD Papua New Guinea
2010s 48.92 million USD 74.2 million USD 25.27 million USD Papua New Guinea
2020s 44.58 million USD 75.04 million USD 30.46 million USD Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Albania or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 60.15 million USD against 39.23 million USD in Albania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Albania and Papua New Guinea?
20.92 million USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Papua New Guinea?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Albania and Papua New Guinea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Albania ranks 93rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/albania/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/albania/papua-new-guinea/">Albania vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.