Americas vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Americas
131,302 million USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
1,296 million USD
in 2023
Americas rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Americas
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k199320082024

How they compare

Americas currently reports 131,302 million USD against 1,296 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 130,006 million USD.

That makes Americas's figure about 101.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Americas has been ahead every year.

Americas ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 29 groups.

Americas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Americas United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 120,268 million USD 616.08 million USD 119,652 million USD Americas
2020s 123,067 million USD 941.87 million USD 122,125 million USD Americas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Americas or United Republic of Tanzania?
Americas, at 131,302 million USD against 1,296 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Americas and United Republic of Tanzania?
130,006 million USD, with Americas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Americas and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Americas ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Americas vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/americas/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/americas/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Americas vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.