Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Australia and New Zealand
102,303 million USD
in 2024
Southern Asia
282,846 million USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd
Southern Asia rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Southern Asia
100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k201020172024

How they compare

Southern Asia currently reports 282,846 million USD against 102,303 million USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 180,543 million USD.

That makes Southern Asia's figure about 2.8 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and Southern Asia ranks 3rd of 119 countries.

Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Southern Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 85,035 million USD 149,988 million USD 64,953 million USD Southern Asia
2020s 97,133 million USD 218,680 million USD 121,547 million USD Southern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Australia and New Zealand or Southern Asia?
Southern Asia, at 282,846 million USD against 102,303 million USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
180,543 million USD, with Southern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and Southern Asia ranks 3rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.