Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Italy: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2,180 million USD
in 2018
Italy
35,144 million USD
in 2024
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
6th
Italy rank
8th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Italy
020.0k40.0k60.0k199720102024

How they compare

Italy currently reports 35,144 million USD against 2,180 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 32,964 million USD.

That makes Italy's figure about 16.1 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th and Italy ranks 8th of 14 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 608.96 million USD 38,222 million USD 37,614 million USD Italy
2010s 1,104 million USD 48,620 million USD 47,515 million USD Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Italy?
Italy, at 35,144 million USD against 2,180 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Italy?
32,964 million USD, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Italy?
18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Italy rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 6th and Italy ranks 8th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Italy: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/italy/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Italy: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.