Canada vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Canada
34,160 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Korea
58,658 million USD
in 2024
Canada rank
9th
Republic of Korea rank
6th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Canada
  • Republic of Korea
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 58,658 million USD against 34,160 million USD in Canada, a difference of 24,498 million USD.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.7 times Canada's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 119 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 14,000 million USD 47,632 million USD 33,633 million USD Republic of Korea
2010s 17,713 million USD 34,624 million USD 16,911 million USD Republic of Korea
2020s 27,336 million USD 49,060 million USD 21,724 million USD Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Canada or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 58,658 million USD against 34,160 million USD in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Canada and Republic of Korea?
24,498 million USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Republic of Korea?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Canada and Republic of Korea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Canada ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/canada/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/canada/republic-of-korea/">Canada vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.