Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Canada
34,160 million USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
1,296 million USD
in 2023
Canada rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Canada
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0k20.0k30.0k199120072024

How they compare

Canada currently reports 34,160 million USD against 1,296 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 32,864 million USD.

That makes Canada's figure about 26.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 119 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 13,686 million USD 64.63 million USD 13,622 million USD Canada
2000s 15,370 million USD 246.35 million USD 15,124 million USD Canada
2010s 17,713 million USD 616.08 million USD 17,097 million USD Canada
2020s 25,630 million USD 941.87 million USD 24,688 million USD Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Canada or United Republic of Tanzania?
Canada, at 34,160 million USD against 1,296 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
32,864 million USD, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Canada and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Canada ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.