China, mainland vs Southern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

China, mainland
320,213 million USD
in 2024
Southern Asia
282,846 million USD
in 2024
China, mainland rank
1st
Southern Asia rank
3rd

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • China, mainland
  • Southern Asia
100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k201020172024

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 320,213 million USD against 282,846 million USD in Southern Asia, a difference of 37,367 million USD.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.1 times Southern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China, mainland ahead.

China, mainland ranks 1st and Southern Asia ranks 3rd of 119 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Southern Asia Difference Ahead
2010s 160,736 million USD 149,988 million USD 10,748 million USD China, mainland
2020s 257,483 million USD 218,680 million USD 38,803 million USD China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, China, mainland or Southern Asia?
China, mainland, at 320,213 million USD against 282,846 million USD in Southern Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between China, mainland and Southern Asia?
37,367 million USD, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Southern Asia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China, mainland and Southern Asia rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
China, mainland ranks 1st and Southern Asia ranks 3rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Southern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/china-mainland/southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/china-mainland/southern-asia/">China, mainland vs Southern Asia: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.