Mozambique vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Mozambique
67.3 million USD
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
60.15 million USD
in 2024
Mozambique rank
89th
Papua New Guinea rank
91st

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Mozambique
  • Papua New Guinea
50100150200250199120072024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 67.3 million USD against 60.15 million USD in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 7.15 million USD.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 89th and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 119 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 87.74 million USD 61.84 million USD 25.9 million USD Mozambique
2010s 162.57 million USD 74.2 million USD 88.37 million USD Mozambique
2020s 104.68 million USD 75.04 million USD 29.64 million USD Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Mozambique or Papua New Guinea?
Mozambique, at 67.3 million USD against 60.15 million USD in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
7.15 million USD, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Papua New Guinea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Mozambique ranks 89th and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/mozambique/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/mozambique/papua-new-guinea/">Mozambique vs Papua New Guinea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.