New Zealand vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

New Zealand
32,976 million USD
in 2024
Russian Federation
24,404 million USD
in 2024
New Zealand rank
10th
Russian Federation rank
12th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • New Zealand
  • Russian Federation
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 32,976 million USD against 24,404 million USD in Russian Federation, a difference of 8,572 million USD.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 12th of 119 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2010s 38,008 million USD 25,764 million USD 12,244 million USD New Zealand
2020s 35,667 million USD 26,940 million USD 8,727 million USD New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, New Zealand or Russian Federation?
New Zealand, at 32,976 million USD against 24,404 million USD in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between New Zealand and Russian Federation?
8,572 million USD, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Russian Federation?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Russian Federation rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
New Zealand ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 12th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/new-zealand/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/new-zealand/russian-federation-2/">New Zealand vs Russian Federation: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.