Northern America vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices

Northern America
98,682 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Korea
58,658 million USD
in 2024
Northern America rank
9th
Republic of Korea rank
6th

Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices over time

  • Northern America
  • Republic of Korea
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200820162024

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 98,682 million USD against 58,658 million USD in Republic of Korea, a difference of 40,024 million USD.

That makes Northern America's figure about 1.7 times Republic of Korea's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Northern America ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 29 groups.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2010s 89,515 million USD 34,624 million USD 54,891 million USD Northern America
2020s 90,184 million USD 49,060 million USD 41,124 million USD Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices, Northern America or Republic of Korea?
Northern America, at 98,682 million USD against 58,658 million USD in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices between Northern America and Republic of Korea?
40,024 million USD, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Republic of Korea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Northern America and Republic of Korea rank globally for credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing — value us$, 2015 prices?
Northern America ranks 9th and Republic of Korea ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/northern-america/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices/northern-america/republic-of-korea/">Northern America vs Republic of Korea: Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
162 places, 3,769 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.